30 Days of OCEANS: Naomi Rose

Senior scientist with Humane Society International, Naomi Rose oversees campaigns to protect wild and captive marine animals.  She is also a member of the International Whaling Commission’s Scientific Committee, Her concern for whales and dolphins comes from her transition from field work to desk work. Given recent suggested changes in who can hunt whales when and where, Naomi’s expertise is much in need. An excerpt from our new book, OCEANS, The Threats to the Seas and What You Can Do to Turn the Tide.

Almost twenty-five years ago, a Ph.D. student at the University of California in Santa Cruz, I spent five summers camping on an uninhabited island and bobbing around in a small rubber inflatable boat following the ins and outs of the lives of a pod of killer whales, or orcas, in the waters off British Columbia. These were the Northern Resident orcas, which spend their summers in the Inside Passage of Vancouver Island, particularly in Johnstone Strait. I was interested in the social dynamics of the males, who stay by their mother’s side for life in this population, yet somehow still manage to father offspring outside of the family.

When I was studying these whales, researchers had been taking their photographs – by which these dramatic black and white animals are easily identified – for about 15 years, following individuals year after year. Using actuarial techniques similar to those used by insurance companies, they had determined that the females in this population were, in the words of one scientist, “immortal.”

Obviously this was a bit of an exaggeration, but the fact is that by the mid-1980s, after having followed these individuals since 1973, orca researchers had observed the loss of very few prime-age adult females. Juveniles of both sexes faced many risks and adult males seemed prone to any number of mid-life health crises. However, if a young female managed to make it into adulthood – past the age of 15, more or less, which is when the average female orca starts bearing calves – she was almost certain to live into her sixties, seventies or eighties.

All of that changed in the 1990s.

The change may have simply been a matter of probability. Perhaps in such a long-lived species, fifteen years wasn’t really long enough to gather enough representative data and the seeming immortality of adult females was just what statisticians call an “artifact” of a small sample size (in this case, the small number of years the animals had been followed). Maybe after ten more years of data collection, the dataset was giving a more accurate picture of orca lives. Maybe it was normal after all for a fair number of females to die in their twenties, thirties or forties.

However, other research was showing that deaths, of all sex and age classes of orcas, increased in years with bad Chinook salmon runs. The orcas of British Columbia aren’t marine mammal hunters, but rather specialize in feasting on salmon. And not just any salmon – they are very picky and love the prized Chinook or king salmon. In the 1990s, due to a host of mostly human-caused factors, there had been a number of poor salmon runs. In these years a larger number than usual of Northern Resident orcas were dying, including adult females who should have been in the prime of their lives.

I was shocked when I heard this news, not having been back to British Columbia in almost a decade. The orcas of Johnstone Strait had been frozen in time in my memory, hale, hearty and thriving. It was appalling to hear that the “immortal” females of my graduate career were dying, at the height of their reproductive years, sometimes with a dependent calf left behind to starve. Many of these females had been the sisters and mothers of the males I had studied for my dissertation research, animals I knew on sight, who had names and personalities and histories. And they were dying not in the natural course of things but because human beings were causing the degradation of their habitat (and that of their salmon prey), polluting their bodies with toxins, and over-exploiting the fish on which they depend.

Posted in Environment
Tags:

3 comments to “30 Days of OCEANS: Naomi Rose”

  1. Dear Dr. Rose:

    I hope that you will receive this e-mail and that this is a good address at which to reach you. I will also send a short letter to the address of the Humane Society in hopes that it gets to you.

    I wanted to tell you that I watched the entire Committee hearing today re,what I assume the point being, new regulations for theme parks for dolphins and killer whales and whether those parks should continue to exist.
    My screen did not say what the hearing was directly about.

    While I am a amateur conservationist and know much about the natural environment, I learned a good deal from you today, especially your final comment, which I am so glad you were able to get out there, about England and the fact that they do not have theme parks anymore because of concerns about the well being and realistic educational value of the animals contained in them. I have also been to
    Sea World, but never before considered the other side, that of the lives of the animals on a daily basis.

    I do have one nagging question. You described the negative changes the world is undergoing now, much due to the greed and lack of regulation of many industries, the best example being the current oil spill and some type of explosion which the Gulf Coast is desperate to contain. As you probably know, lobbyists for the oil industry were able to dispel much regulation which was proposed and might have negated this spill in recent years. That being said, animals are dying out and species are lost every day. If we do not have zoos and aquariums, where WILL our children and ourselves for that matter, get to see these animals live and at least view them? I suppose one could take an African safari, for example, but even there it is almost a theme park setting without the animals doing tricks. How can this situation be resolved for the benefit of all or can it?

    We have a lot in common in an activist way. I am one of the volunteer founders of the nonsmoker protection movement, beginning around 1973, as President of my statewide organization in Maryland, along with about 10 other really grass roots organizations, and I mean grass roots then, not grass roots now, with current million dollar budgets. Our budget was dollars and few of those, but we were extremely motivated, and helped to pass the first nonsmoker protection legislation in any tobacco state in 1975. I went on to work for 7 years in New Mexico and we passed nonsmoker protection legislation here in 1985. Of course, the movement needs no explanation now and there have been tremendous changes world wide regarding the health needs of nonsmokers. So I understand you and have the greatest respect for your work and I just wanted to tell you. I hope that you will not be discouraged. With the unfortunate death of this trainer, perhaps a door has been opened that may bring real change or perhaps at least a compromise regarding real education for the public and the chance to seriously consider the lives and needs of the animals involved.

    I hope that you receive this, and could perhaps let me know with a very brief e-mail that you did.

    Most Sincerely,
    Lesley Olsher, MSW

  2. last time we had a flash flood on our area and inflatable boats always come in handy ::

  3. those polyurethane inflatable boats are very sturdy and some are kevlar lined too but they are expensive `:~

Leave a comment

Sponsors